top of page

Data summary

High and rising inequality is one of the United States’ most pressing economic and societal issues. Since the early 1980s, the total share of income claimed by the bottom 90 percent of Americans has steadily decreased, with the majority of income gains going to the top 1 percent. These trends would not be such a major concern if our education system compensated for these inequities by helping level the playing field and enabling children to rise above their birth circumstances.

But that is hardly the case. Rather, the fraction of children who earn more than their parents (absolute mobility) has fallen from approximately 90 percent for children born in 1940 to 50 percent for children born in the 1980s. And the tight links between economic inequalities and achievement gaps cast doubt on asserted equality of opportunity that promotes social mobility and puts the “American Dream” within viable reach.

Extensive research has conclusively demonstrated that children’s social class is one of the most significant predictors—if not the single most significant predictor—of their educational success. Moreover, it is increasingly apparent that performance gaps by social class take root in the earliest years of children’s lives and fail to narrow in the years that follow.

Much is known about the determinants and mechanisms that drive early skills gaps among children of different backgrounds, but our failure to narrow social-class-based skills gaps from one generation of students to the next calls for further analysis to determine the degree of influence these factors have and how interventions employed in recent years to address these factors have or have not worked and why. Moreover, shifting economic and demographic landscapes emphasize the need for more robust policy strategies to address the gaps. This three-part study thus combines a statistical analysis of early skills gaps among a recent cohort of children and changes in them over time with a qualitative study of multifaceted, school-district-level strategies to narrow them. https://www.epi.org/files/pdf/132500.pdf

Portland Public spends more per pupil than almost all other area districts

Shasta Kearns Moore

 

Tuesday, October 24, 2017

These five charts show the wide range of needs and resources in Portland-area public school districts.

Portland Public Schools spends more per pupil than almost any other district in the area and most of that money comes from local tax dollars.

That's according to data released earlier this month from the Oregon Department of Education, which releases school financing information as part of its annual school report cards. An analysis of the data by the Portland Tribune included 11 districts in Portland and its suburbs.

https://pamplinmedia.com/pt/9-news/376284-261606-portland-public-spends-more-per-pupil-than-almost-all-other-area-districts

PORTLAND PUBLIC SCHOOLS: DATA AND REPORTS

  • Data and Reports

    Portland Public Schools has a number of standard reports and data sets available. Reports flagged with ∞ can also serve as a data source.

        Research briefs and evaluation reports

∞     Student achievement results

∞     School Profiles

∞     Discipline and behavior

∞     Enrollment reports

∞     Graduation and completion rates

bottom of page